Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Chick RepellantWhat accessory will keep you from getting laid?
It’s Geekalicious
A Dr. Who Tardis USB hub. I want one.
The Top 5 Smallest Nations
Some interesting trivia here. The Vatican is the only nation where the ATMs offer Latin as a language option.
Secrets of Writing: Story Values
If there is anything in this book stands out as the most useful bit of technique you can learn, this is it. Story Values.
Everything else in this book is important or useful. But this is a concept that truly revolutionizes your work and sets it above the pack. Story values are how you demonstrate character arcs. It’s how you demonstrate change. It’s how you make a story seem like it squeezed the last drop of passion out of the conflict.
Story values are the levels a conflict can pass through. They are the limits of human experience. You need to take the Hero through all the levels of human experience to craft a completely satisfying tale. Once you understand these levels, you can then set the goals you need to meet by the story’s end.
Values are the points on a curve any given status or emotional state of being can take. There are four levels of story values: Positive, Compromised, Negative, Detrimental. Let’s examine what these are. When I list the examples below, they will be in six categories. The next set of examples show you their alternates on the curve.
Positive: This is the value we all want our life to be experiencing. It’s when things are great. Everything is coming up roses. You’re at the top of the heap. Examples of positive values are: Love, Wealthy, Justice, Truth, Healthy, Free.
Compromised: When you enter this plane of values, things are on the skids. You’re on a downward spiral but haven’t hit bottom yet. Things could also get better. Examples: Indifference, Broke, Unfairness, White Lies, Sick, Constrained.
Negative: When you hit bottom, this is where you enter the territory of the Negative values. It’s the skids, the pits, etc. This is a destructive value, but not the most destructive. Things could still get worse. But worse is something you don’t even want to think about. Examples: Hate, Bankrupt, Injustice, Lies, Dead, Imprisoned.
Detrimental: If Negative is when you hit bottom, Detrimental is when the bottom falls out from under you. Once you’ve hit the realm of detrimental, you can only lose or win. There’s no other way to go. You’ve reached the end of the line. Examples: Hate masquerading as love, In debt to a murderous loanshark, Tyranny, Self Deception, Undead, In a Concentration camp.
Exploring the Values
Let’s see how they work in terms of a story. The hero is our milk loving friend Kyle. The villain is a loan shark named Rafe.
WEALTHY: Kyle starts off a wealthy man. But due to something that happens during the Trigger Event he becomes flat broke during the first Turning point. He spends the second act trying to get himself back on top, so he takes out loans to gamble in Vegas, hoping to win the money he needs to end up where he was before. That’s his goal in the story. But Kyle keeps losing during the progressive complication stage and his credit is cut off. He’s run out of money. He’s bankrupt. No one will lend to him. No one but Rafe, a loan shark. Kyle takes the loan from Rafe. But he loses the money and can’t pay Rafe back. Now Rafe is actively looking for Kyle. He plans to either break his legs or kill him as an example. Kyle only has one quarter to his name. He gambled his last few bucks on the slots. As he turns to leave the Casino Kyle sees Rafe across the room, looking at him. Rafe’s men are with him and they move to block all the exits. Rafe approaches Kyle with deadly intent. Kyle has nowhere to run. We’ve now reached the climax.
The story began with Kyle being wealthy, the positive extreme. We took the values down to an extreme low of being in debt to a psycho. Imagine how effective this would play, fleshed out with characterization and plot twists.
Now we can choose between three possible endings. Up, Down, or Ironic. These will determine which path Kyle’s life will end up on.
UP: Kyle puts his last quarter in a slot machine as Rafe and his men walk toward him. Desperate, Kyle pulls the lever. He sees Rafe draw his gun. Suddenly, lights and alarms go off. Rafe stops in his tracks, surprised. Kyle turns to look at the slot machine. He’s just won the big pay off! Two million dollars! Kyle is rich again! Rafe puts away his gun and says: “Congratulations.”
DOWN: Kyle puts his last quarter in a slot machine as Rafe and his men walk toward him. Desperate, Kyle pulls the lever. He sees Rafe draw his gun. Rafe’s expression turns from bad to worse as he draws close and jabs the gun against Kyle’s back. Kyle turns to look at the slot. He lost. RAFE: “You had your chance, Kyle. Now you’re going for a ride!” Rafe’s men grab Kyle’s arms and he’s dragged off into the night.
IRONIC: Kyle puts his last quarter in a slot machine as Rafe and his men walk toward him. Desperate, Kyle pulls the lever. He sees Rafe draw his gun. Suddenly, lights and alarms go off. Rafe stops in his tracks, surprised. Kyle turns to look at the slot. He’s just won the big pay off. $100,000. Exactly the amount of money he owes Rafe. Rafe puts his gun away and almost smiles. Kyle wipes the sweat from his brow. He’s still broke, and in debt to other people, but at least he doesn’t owe Rafe anymore. Just then, three security guards show up with a man in a cheap suit. The man says: “I’m Mr. Finster from the I.R.S. You’ll have to pay the income tax on that money.” Rafe can’t make a move with the guards there, so he leaves. Kyle knows he’s been given some extra time. Will it be enough?
TRUTH: We can add on more values to the same story by choosing those which are complimentary to the plot. Same exact story, but here’s how more values adds to the plot. Kyle’s a successful man with his own business. He’s level headed. He’s honest and fair. But he needs a big deal to make his business more successful and he tells a white lie to a potential client. This is the Trigger event. The white lie not only costs Kyle the deal, but he’s also sued by the client. He loses the law suit during the Turning Point of act one and becomes broke. During the second act he borrows money, using false information (lies) to get the loans. When this is discovered his credit is cut off, so he starts gambling. As he loses, he goes into denial, telling himself he is going to win it all back. And he lies to himself right up until the end, wanting to believe that success is just around the corner.
As you see, the values serve several roles. They establish the levels of conflict. They are the basis of motivation and causation. They raise the stakes in the story.
When you use values to go from one extreme to the other, you build a powerful charge. And when the climax occurs you have things at such an extreme point, that reversing everything in one final act, righting all the wrongs, setting things back to where the hero wants them to be, creates a feeling of great exhilaration for the Audience. Or it makes the Ironic ending funny. Or it makes the negative ending devastating.
Notice how the values are married to the causal effect. The Audience needs to see that actions have consequences. They expect the Newtonian rules of physics to apply to a story. When you do one thing, it causes another thing to occur. This principle creates a feeling of realism.
So we use values to add more and more power to the conflict(s) of the story. We can tie together three or four sets of values easily. Even more if we have to. And by doing so we create a feeling of believability and complexity in the work. We also make the story meaningful.
When a character goes through the limits of human experience, they really discover the meaning of the word “adventure.”
REMEMBER: Take us through the values and we’ll feel the full range of human experience.
I Want One
The History of Home Computers in Commercials
This is a real walk down memory lane. The one where Apple claims to have more software than PCs is ironic.
California to Ban Light Bulbs
A California lawmaker wants to make his state the first to ban incandescent lightbulbs as part of California’s groundbreaking initiatives to reduce energy use and greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.
The “How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act” would ban incandescent lightbulbs by 2012 in favor of energy-saving compact fluorescent lightbulbs.
“Incandescent lightbulbs were first developed almost 125 years ago, and since that time they have undergone no major modifications,” California Assemblyman Lloyd Levine said on Tuesday.
“Meanwhile, they remain incredibly inefficient, converting only about 5 percent of the energy they receive into light.”
The story says this politician may introduce a law. Be assured, he will. He’s already introduced a law, that passed that forces grocery stores to recycle plastic bags.
So here’s another example of GW hysteria being used to limit our rights. I’ve been saying it for years, Cigarettes are just the beginning. They are slowly trying to make them illegal by removing people’s ability to smoke just about every where. The excuse is second hand smoke, which no credible study shows it had any effect on someone’s health. Next, they are going after junk food claiming the obesity epidemic. Watch more and more hysteria there and the limiting of your choices.
GW will be used to make a lot of things illegal. And they always start out with some mild argument like this one claiming fluorescents are better. Then they wil just start shving laws down your throat.
I have florescent bulbs in my house, but I also have the other kind. Fluorescents last longer but they give off inferior light.
Personally, I am really sick of government stooges telling me what I can and cannot do. These people are going too far. No, strike that, they have gone too far years ago and it’s getting much worse. And it’s all from the position that they are saving us from something, which is generally a lie. And I’ll throw in airport security. Most of that is complete nonsense.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Yuck-o-Rama
The Australian Mouse Plague of 1993
More GW BS
U.S. scientists felt pressured to tailor their writings on global warming to fit the Bush administration’s skepticism, in some cases at the behest of an ex-oil industry lobbyist, a congressional committee heard on Tuesday.
“Our investigations found high-quality science struggling to get out,” Francesca Grifo of the watchdog group Union of Concerned Scientists told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
A survey by the group found that 150 climate scientists personally experienced political interference in the past five years, for a total of at least 435 incidents.
“Nearly half of all respondents perceived or personally experienced pressure to eliminate the words ‘climate change,’ ‘global warming’ or other similar terms from a variety of communications,” Grifo said.
The Union of Concerned Scientists are a left wing group that pushes a leftist agenda under the guise of being scientists. But they are in fact, rank ideologues and they often tell whopping falsehoods. This is a classic example. Man Made Global Warming is a theory proposed by anti-capitalists as a weapon against progress. It’s no surprise that the biggest proponents of GW are left wing. But since the basis of their theory is almost entirely built on the foundation of logical fallacies, and doctored science (eg: Computer Models), it’s credibility will be completely shot down by the reality which is the earth’s climate. The climate will do what it will. Mankind be damned. We’re just along for the ride.
Global Warming/Climate Change • (3) Comments • Permalink
The Distance of Stars
They are a long, long way away from here.
