The Great Global Warming Swindle

For those of you who missed it the first time, here is the British documentary that exposes many of the lies and falsehoods of the Global Warming movement.

The GW shills tried to discredit it, but the facts of the documentary do a great deal of damage to their credibility. And their arguments are as bogus as ever. I recommend this if you haven’t seen it because it shows the most obvious reason for global warming. It’s called the sun.

Here is the producer’s page if you want to order a DVD. The GW hacks have tried to get the DVD release stopped. They say it will be coming out soon. 

Very interesting documentary.  However even as persuasive as the arguments and presented data are, even they are not without their own share of controversy.

Posted by  on  09/05  at  09:56 AM

Both sides need to be able to speak freely without the kind of oppressive censorship and attacks the left has done against the skeptics.

It’s also very telling that the pro-GW types have been caught lying repeatedly. From listing all of the IPCC scientists as being in agreement, when they are not, to the recent NASA scandal where their figures were found to be massively wrong.

That calls all of their arguments into question.

Posted by  on  09/05  at  04:13 PM

Ha ... I saw that program way back, and it’s as much a hack as any. I can’t belive you would actually quote this as telling the “truth”, considering that so many of the scientiest feel that they have been used out of context, and so many of the arguments put forward in this program, have been proven to be false/lies.

*sigh*

Posted by  on  09/06  at  12:48 AM

Yes, I know. You believe the GW propaganda. Except those so called “proving their statements to be lies” argument isn’t true. I debunked some of theior debunking awhile ago.

The facts are, the pro GW side is constantly caught lying. And that brings their arguments into question.

Posted by James Hudnall  on  09/06  at  08:25 AM

Dude, you havn’t “debunked” anything ... you just say your opinion, based on the “facts that you choose to belive in” ... that’s hardly debunking anything.

And yes, I know. You belive the anti-GW propaganda.

You keep bringing those measurements made by NASA - please remember that that is NOT the only thing that GW is depending on. GW is a GLOBAL thing - not depended on some tempatures measured in US alone. There is NO evidence that they were made by design, but rather accident.
But look at all the NONDESPUTABLE evidence out there ... and I’m not talking about speculations 50 years into the future, but the things that are happening right now.
A HUGE gleiser has melted, revealing a new island. And the icecap on the northpole is melting many times faster than earlier - there will be NO icecap in 15 years! And there is absolutly nothing we, or anyone else can do about that now.

And let me just finish of with this parafrasing:
The facts are, the pro ANTI-GW side is constantly caught lying. And that brings their arguments into question.

Posted by  on  09/06  at  09:26 AM

“… Except those so called “proving their statements to be lies” argument isn’t true… “

Oh, and one more thing, I’d love it if you would read the article on the movie on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle) ... especially the “Reception and criticism” ... then lets talk later!

Posted by  on  09/06  at  10:02 AM

Ah, Wikipedia. Known for being the font of accuracy. Seeing how you never respond with counter facts when I point out errors on your side, I’m not inclined to bother.

Posted by James Hudnall  on  09/06  at  11:37 AM

Yes, wikipedia is known for not being accurate - that’s why ALL the facts that I’m mentioning are provided with an of-site link, so you can check the facts.

“Seeing how you never respond with counter facts when I point out errors on your side,”
Dude ... you are doing the exact same thing! Please, PLEASE realise that!
It’s sad to see how you endorse a movie like “GGWS”, (even providing a link to the producer so you can buy the DVD) when the movie is SO full of flaws and LIES its rediculus.

Posted by  on  09/07  at  12:09 AM

Your arguments are pretty weak because I have already debunked some of those counter-claims and I don’t feel like doing it again. The film is not full of lies and distortions. It is full of cites that point out lies and distortions on your side, which have not been refuted and...gosh...you just ignore them so you can focus on one or two places where they might have screwed up, as if that renders the whole thing false.

The problem with your logic is, by that principal, none of the GW stuff would be valid since so many of its pillars of contention are based on logical fallacies and outright lies.

I’ve been over this a zillion times, so I don’t feel the need to repeat them.

Posted by James Hudnall  on  09/07  at  09:15 AM

Whatever ... you just keep telling yourself that.

Posted by  on  09/07  at  11:44 AM
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main