Yep

Another one bites the dust.

I disagree with the sentiment about Obama being the best choice, however. There is no good choice this time. But McCain has a slightly better track record. 

1. Obama’s Marxist leanings are truly scary, and about half of the voting public appear to think his radical, bigoted ideas along with his wife’s and his “preacher’s” are mainstream thanks to indoctrination in public schools.  Maybe Che’s portrait will replace Washington’s in the future......

   Posted by  on  05/08  at  07:03 AM

2. I don’t think he can win. Hillary is unpopular and he had a hard time beating her. The election is McCain’s to lose.

   Posted by  on  05/08  at  09:03 AM

3. “The election is McCain’s to lose.”

   I agree, but it would be the other way around if Hillary was the contender.  The polls, so far, constantly show Hillary as the stronger of the two when running against McCain.  The big flaw with Obama is that McCain consistenly runs ahead of him in Ohio, the must win state.

   Posted by  on  05/08  at  09:40 AM

4. consistenly S/B consistently

   Posted by  on  05/08  at  09:42 AM

5. Not only that, but I think McCain will trounce him in the debates. Hillary was not all that experienced a politician. Her much vaunted Clinton political machine fumbled badly in the primaries.

   Obama is still wet behind the ears. McCain should easily be able to beat him. Especially considering McCain is fairly witty and Obama is kind of a stiff shirt.

   Also, Obama relies too much on young voters. Ask Dean how reliable they are.

   Posted by  on  05/08  at  10:27 AM

6. McCain better kick Obama’s ass...ESPECIALLY since the latter thinks there are 57 States in the Union. Or is that 60?

   Posted by Macker  on  05/10  at  07:24 PM

7. “the latter thinks there are 57 States in the Union. Or is that 60?”

   Now that is good!

   Posted by Brock Townsend  on  05/10  at  08:03 PM
Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main